Sunday, May 06, 2007

Spelling Bee Kid aims to Bring Back Deported VHP Rowdy

Today the New York Times is running a story about a thirteen year old scripps national spelling bee contestant Kunal Sah who aims to win the competition to raise awareness of his parent's stalled immigration case. It's the sort of quirky story that immediately pulled on my heartstrings because I have known many people to get stuck in an oppressive US immigration bureaucracy, humiliated and eventually deported back to their home countries.

Kunal's parents were Bihar natives who were seeking asylum in the states on the basis of what they perceived as persecution from their neighbors. See, Mr. Sah had been a rowdy for Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), a fundamentalist Hindu outfit known around the world for its deep pockets and regressively conservative agenda.
Mr. Sah acknowledged in his application that he had been active in organizing a campaign against Babri Mosque, in northern India, because it was “built on our sacred land” and that he “actively participated” in riots intended to demolish.
After several years pursuing his case in courts and in front of immigration officials the Times reports that:
In denying him haven, immigration officials noted that Mr. Sah “had participated in the persecution of non-Hindus and thus was ineligible for asylum.”
While I feel for the son who has been separated from his parents by State powers, I basically agree with the decision. Why should the United States allow violent anti-muslim groups into the the country. This is the same outfit that helped plan and execute the riots in Gujarat, demolished the Babri mosque and continues a direct lineage of colonial "divide and rule" strategy as it sets one community against another.

Sah says he feels that Muslims in his community may target him for retaliation for his involvement in the VHP. I find this unlikely in itself, but while it could be true, I see no reason that America should protect perpetrators of hate crimes from other countries.

While the story has a premises with a good hook: "thirteen year old spells to get his family un-deported", the Times should think twice about running articles that are sympathetic to the struggles of violent fundamentalists from other countries. No matter how cute their sons' story's may be.

Labels:

9 Comments:

At May 06, 2007 10:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The right-wing BJP (the political wing of the VHP and RSS) actually came to power in the Indian national/parlimentary elections within a few years of the Babri Mosque being toppled.

That tells us how difficult life was for VHP members in India!

 
At May 07, 2007 2:58 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, I forgot, the only people who are granted Asylum in the US are genuine opperssed people.
Whoever has heard of "asylum" being granted say, to, Iraqis, who helped the Americans rule over their bretheren.

 
At May 07, 2007 3:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Or, to the dictators and their offspring, who helped the rich corporations loot the natural resources of their countries.
The hypocrisy and avarice of the white man continues unabated...

 
At May 07, 2007 5:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

rediff.com did the same story a while ago, and the reporter got a lot of flak for sympathising with a violent fanatic.
Lot's of irony in the nytimes article with the uncle complaining of racism, while his brother went around organizing riots and demolising mosques!
If the family misses the son, surely there's plenty of opportunity in India...they just dont want to lose their chance to have their son sponsor them back to the U.S at a later date.

 
At May 09, 2007 8:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

*cough*

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6637481.stm

 
At May 18, 2007 10:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see that Carney Sahib has chosen to ignore the comments on this post.

 
At May 19, 2007 1:47 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

After reading this story here, I listened with interest to a story on NPR yesterday, on Day To Day.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10231447
I was amazed how the story never touched on what Ken Sah's asylum petition was about. It was mostly about the kid trying to win a competition to further his parent's asylum case, with a little bit thrown in about how Ken hasn't made too many friends in the community where he built his business. Aww!

 
At May 22, 2007 1:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

see http;// spacemanspiff.wordpress.com

Screw the spelling Bee article name

 
At May 29, 2007 11:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"In denying him haven, immigration officials noted that Mr. Sah “had participated in the persecution of non-Hindus and thus was ineligible for asylum.” "
Then Persecuting a Hindu is perfectly acceptable for asylum. What fun! where are my weapons. Here I come for USA with a Asylum Petition. Hooray!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home